Sciencespeaking topic
Regression to the mean: after a very bad performance, a better one usually follows even with no intervention at all. When we credit an improvement to what we did, are we misreading nature?
— regression to the mean
practice with this topic
Set the timer (5-30 min), take 20 seconds of prep if you like, start talking. Jot your thoughts onto the sticky-note board.
similar topics
- Maybe the reason we have never encountered intelligent aliens is that intelligence is not actually a winning evolutionary strategy.
- Mendel discovered the laws of heredity through his pea experiments but went unnoticed for years; how does this show what it means to be ahead of one's time in science?
- Overcoming the tragedy of the commons: how did Elinor Ostrom show that rules and community can prevent the ruin of shared resources? Are the state or privatization really necessary?
- A beehive decides where to build its new home by voting: scout bees dance for different sites and the one that gathers the most support wins. A brainless hive makes better decisions than any single bee. Is democracy a human invention, or a very old algorithm of nature?
- Let's talk about how Lavoisier, by showing that combustion involves oxygen, overturned phlogiston theory and launched modern chemistry.